var cl_wpb_key = "27f2d3eaec"; Cody Love, 16, of Hodgenville, allegedly shot and killed 17-year-old Landon I. Knox, also of Hodgenville, in December 2022. By continuing to use this website, you agree to UniCourts General Disclaimer, Terms of Service, The alleged agreement to pay by installments did not deprive the Claimant of its interest in obtaining a declaration of enforceability in Germany, even if it postponed the date on which payment became due. The Oberlandesgericht noted that the Respondent had failed to recognize that public policy violations regarding international arbitration awards were to be assessed exclusively on the standard of international public policy and that, accordingly, a refusal of enforcement could be justified on public policy grounds only where the arbitral proceedings showed a grave defect that affected the basis of public and economic life in Germany. Search Circuit and District Court case records online. Civil litigation is heard at the district court. A New York Times columnist wrote that death is one way student loan borrowers could get out of paying for their debts in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision. This would have the undesirable result that foreign judgments and awards granting claims from a contract which is void according to 138 BGB are never recognizable and enforceable. It reasoned that there were no public policy or arbitrability grounds to deny enforcement which could be analysed at its own initiative. Email: Nicole Garcia. There is 1 Court per 6,639 . such as federal, state, district, superior, criminal, common, circuit, judicial, judiciary, divorce, appeals, family, traffic, and small claims courts. | 11/21/2017, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | | 06/08/2016, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | It held that the decision was not a declaration of enforceability but rather an independent order and could be declared enforceable in its own right. It held that the case law of the Bundesgerichtshof pertaining to the preclusion of pleas not raised before the tribunals or courts of the country in which the award was rendered no longer applied after the 1998 reform to German arbitration law. A party sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award in Germany. VS. CITY OF LEITCHFIELD, KENTUCKY, E. . Property The Oberlandesgericht Mnchen (Higher Regional Court Munich) granted enforcement, finding that the Claimant had complied with the formal conditions for recognition and enforcement under German law (which applied in virtue of the more-favorable-right rule under Article VII(1) NYC) by supplying the original arbitral award with a translation. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NA Et Al VS ANDERSON, JAMES L. GRAYSON COUNTY Et Al VS MAYFIELD, DEBORAH Et Al, ABC INVESTMENT, CO VS GONZALEZ, KATHERINE, DISCOVER BANK Et Al VS MCFARLAND, FLORENCE D, ABC INVESTMENT CO Et Al VS SALINAS, LIBRADO, CAPITAL ONE NA Et Al VS SHEPANSKI, FRANCIS E. 20-T-00469COMMONWEALTH VS. YADEN, JASON EDWARD, 21-D-00096-001PROBUS, LYNDA KEVIN VS. PROBUS, BILLY JOE, 21-T-00441COMMONWEALTH VS. PIERCY, TIMOTHY SCOTT JR, 21-T-00772COMMONWEALTH VS. DURBIN, ANTHONY CURTIS, 21-T-01110COMMONWEALTH VS. COLVIN, BRENNAN DANIEL, 22-D-00002-002SALTSMAN, KATELYN VS. CORBIN, TYLER W, 22-D-00038-001HAYES COLE, JENNIFER ANN VS. VALASKY, LARRY, 22-D-00065-001ALVEY, CAROLICIA FRANCES VS. ALVEY, SAMANTHA M, 22-D-00067-001MILAM, TIFFANY VS. WALLING, DAVID, 22-D-00069-001PROBUS, SHAWN VS. LINDSEY, CASSANDRA, 22-D-00077-001SMITH, MICHAEL VS. CARNES, MEGAN, 22-D-00079-001FULKERSON, KAYSIE VS. SHARTZER, NETHANIEL, 22-D-00085-001WHITE, WHITNEY VS. LESLIE, COTY, 22-D-00088-001HOLSCHUH, MELISSA ELAINE VS. POOLE, CHRISTIAN CHEYENNE, 22-D-00089-001HOLDERMAN, KATRINA S VS. COATES, RANDALL R, 22-D-00091-001COLLETT, TABITHA KATHERINE VS. HOSKINS, MICHAEL W, 22-D-00092-001WELLS, LARAH VS. WELLS, TIMOTHY, 22-F-00234COMMONWEALTH VS. LOGSDON, DEWAYNE W, 22-F-00237COMMONWEALTH VS. DUFF, EDWIN T, 22-F-00239COMMONWEALTH VS. DAVIDSON, DESTANY ANN, 22-F-00241COMMONWEALTH VS. PATRICK, MELISSA ROSERAE, 22-F-00242COMMONWEALTH VS. PATRICK, MELISSA ROSERAE, 22-F-00248COMMONWEALTH VS. KRAHWINKEL, RUSSELL H, 22-F-00250COMMONWEALTH VS. CRANE, GLYNDON I, 22-F-00251COMMONWEALTH VS. HUMPHREY, TOMMIE, 22-F-00252COMMONWEALTH VS. None of the information offered by this site can be used for assessing or evaluating a person's eligibility for employment, housing, insurance, credit, or for any other purpose covered under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The Claimant had obtained a favourable arbitration award following arbitration proceedings at the International Chamber of Commerce in San Diego, which granted it certain insolvency creditor claims against the Respondent. The Claimant sought recognition and enforcement of an award rendered in its favor in France by the Chambre Arbitrale Internationale pour les Fruits et Lgumes (CAIFL). Contract | 06/25/2016, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: WEBB, ERNEST L.; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NA, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | 4501-4600 (out of 4948) court records for Grayson County District Court, TX. In 1981, the Parties concluded an investment contract for the construction of an observatory, which included an agreement for the resolution of disputes by three arbitrators. 21-CR-00248 COMMONWEALTH VS. | 07/19/2018, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Nor was there a violation of due process that could constitute grounds for non-enforcement under either Article V(1)(b) or V(2)(b) NYC. | 01/26/2017, JUDGMENT: PLAINTIFF; COSTS: $58.00; PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $8,491.29; IS JUDGMENT SATISFIED: YES; DATE SATISFACTION FILED: 01/11/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Information includes guidelines, forms, educational resources, and a roster of mediators searchable by name or location. Grayson County, Phone Number: 903-813-4311 | 05/26/2016, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Seller argued that the counterclaims were inadmissible in the proceedings because the three contracts which formed the basis for the Buyers counterclaims all contained arbitration clauses. DISCOVER BANK Et Al VS BRYANT, SHIRLEY T. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION Et Al VS CLOUGH, STEVEN. The Swedish parent company delivered the goods sending along the General Conditions which contained an arbitration clause of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. Contract Circuit and District Court Dockets | K105 Grayson County Divorce Records are legal documents relating to a couple's divorce in Grayson County, Texas. Nor did the language of the proceedings violate due process, as the Defendant failed to show that this prevented the presentation of its case. In 2007, the Seller commenced arbitration at the SCC seeking damages for breach of contract. | 06/02/2017, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: FINK, EILEEN F.; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: CAPITAL ONE BANK, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Resources include answers to frequently asked questions, locations of family courts, divorce education, and domestic violence treatment providers. GRAYSON County CIRCUIT Court Docket for 11/14/2022 Courtroom: ALL Subdivision: ALL NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCKET - SUBJECT TO CHANGE Room:C 01:00 PM 20-CI-00114 RMI, INC. POWERS, THOMAS, 22-F-00253COMMONWEALTH VS. LOGSDON, CHARLES WINFORD, 22-F-00254COMMONWEALTH VS. NUNN, TRISTAN D. A Morgantown man and his young daughter were killed when a tree fell on their vehicle. UniCourt uses cookies to improve your online experience, for more information please see our Privacy Policy. Call, or visit the court's website if listed above. The Defendant opposed the application of enforcement arguing a violation of its right to be heard by the arbitral tribunal. Circuit and District Court Dockets | K105 Other The Parties concluded an agreement referring disputes relating to the bill to the Arbitration Court of the Czech Chamber of Commerce, to be governed by Czech law. View information about Kentucky Drug Court, which can set up a treatment program in lieu of jail for some offenders. Germany / 01 September 2009 / Germany, Oberlandesgericht Mnchen / 34 Sch 14/09. VS. CITY OF LEITCHFIELD, KENTUCKY, ET AL, 21-CR-00248COMMONWEALTH VS. WARD, CHRISTOPHER A, 16-CI-00058PARKS, JOYCE VS. | 03/17/2016, JUDGMENT: PLAINTIFF; COSTS: 58.0; PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: 6649.01; IS JUDGMENT SATISFIED: YES; DATE SATISFACTION FILED: 11/07/2018, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | This is so, said the Court, because the prohibition of reviewing the substance of the case only allows a limited control of the accuracy of the award. 601-700 (out of 4948) court records for Grayson County District Court, TX. Following a telephone advertisement, the Claimants signed standard form contracts with one of the Defendants agents for the provision of stock option services. Galax General and Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Combined Courts Home; Virginia's Court System; Online Services ; Case Status and Information . Forfeiture Other The Court found that, while Article V NYC did not contain such a preclusion rule, such a rule would be applicable based on German law since Article VII(1) NYC allowed the application of domestic court practice favorable to the recognition of foreign arbitral awards. | 04/15/2016, JUDGMENT: PLAINTIFF; COSTS: $58.00; PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $5,091.58; IS JUDGMENT SATISFIED: YES; DATE SATISFACTION FILED: 08/30/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Oberlandesgericht Saarbrcken granted enforcement. They include the divorce papers that the couple files in Grayson County Court, as well as any records created during the divorce procedure, and a divorce certificate. Germany / 24 January 2011 / Germany, Oberlandesgericht Dsseldorf (Higher Regional Court of Dsseldorf) / I-9 U 7/10 / I-9 U 7/10, Germany / 20 January 2011 / Germany, Kammergericht / 20 Sch 09/09. 72, 60435 Frankfurt a. Leitchfield, KY 42754. | 12/08/2020, JUDGMENT: PLAINTIFF; PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $1,500.00; INTEREST AWARD: 6%; IS JUDGMENT SATISFIED: YES; DATE SATISFACTION FILED: 05/17/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Property District Court - Kentucky Court of Justice This guide contains information on all the District Courts, Child Protection Courts, and the Grayson County Child Support (IV-D) Court. Property A list of offices in each county is included. Circuit and District Court Dockets; Circuit and District Court Dockets. Thus, the question arose whether German law could accept the reference made back to German domestic arbitration law by Article VII(1) NYC for the requirement of an "agreement in writing" set out in Article II(2) NYC. Web Accessibility. Leverage UniCourt's Legal Data as a Service (LDaaS) to get bulk access to court data from General District Court - Grayson County. It concluded that this was not the case for any of the public policy violations raised by the Respondent. Pay Kentucky court fines and fees online. | 10/23/2019, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Defendant alleged that in the course of the proceedings, the Parties agreed to payment by installments. Services include application assistance, contacts and office locations, child support calculation and modification, paternity, and wage withholding. However, the Court said, the case at bar is particular because the Buyer based the alleged violation of the domestic public order and the invalidity of the arbitration agreement on a substantive objection: the price gap the Buyer was aware of already during the arbitration proceedings. | 09/15/2021, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE C; PLAINTIFF: COMMONWEALTH OF VA, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | This website was created to host information on the implementation of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, signed in New York on 10 June 1958, with a view of promoting its uniform and effective application throughout the world. The website provides access to the case-law from a number of jurisdictions on the application of the Convention by domestic courts as well as information on the ratification of the Convention by selected States. Resources for the Grayson County District Court as well as online resources applicable to courts generally in Grayson County, Kentucky, and resources applicable to all courts inKentucky. | 03/31/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | 2 min read. Grayson County Detention Center Address. | 05/03/2021, RESULT: CONTINUED; HEARING TYPE: CIVIL HEARING, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | It concluded that since all three arbitration clauses were valid, the Buyers counterclaims were inadmissible based on the application by analogy of Section 1032(1) of the German Civil Procedure Code. 72, 60435 Frankfurt a. Needing bullpen help with their elite offense and rotation, the Texas Rangers acquired Aroldis Chapman from the Kansas City Royals Friday. | 05/25/2016, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: BEEMAN, KYRA; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: ABC INVESTMENT CO, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Forms may also be downloaded and filled out by hand. Contract Germany / 08 June 2010 / Bundesgerichtshof / XI ZR 349/08. if (count_closing <= 0) { View and download a booklet about protective orders, including types of orders, how to obtain an order, effects of an order, violations, and changes. Search court cases for free, read the case summary, find docket information, download court documents, track case status, and get alerts when cases are updated. Applicable NYC Provisions. New Jersey officials say that a coyote attacked a 13-year-old girl, a man, as well as a dog on Friday afternoon, stating that it is still on the run. | 08/16/2019, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | County and District Courts - Grayson County Texas The Oberlandesgericht dismissed all of the Respondents objections and granted enforcement, reasoning that the Respondent could have raised the arguments in the annulment proceedings under the United States Federal Arbitration Act, but had not done so within the applicable time limits, and was now precluded from raising them in the present enforcement proceedings. 1DT183451-5. Filter cases further by date of filing, jurisdiction, case type, party type, and party representation. The Oberlandesgericht Mnchen (Higher Regional Court Munich) refused to declare the award enforceable on the grounds that there was no written arbitration agreement. The Oberlandesgericht considered that the Defendant's objection was not precluded because it had failed to contest the award in Sweden. Moreover, the Court did not find the agreement to constitute a collusion under Ukranian law applicable to that question. It held that since the sales contract was not void. 19-CI-00111BARTOS, STEVEN JOHN VS. BARTOS, LANETTE E. 19-CI-00136LEAR, LAURA K , ET AL VS. MILLINER, CAMERON B. This would only be the case if the subject matter of the dispute were not capable of settlement by arbitration under German law or the recognition or enforcement of the arbitral award would be contrary to public policy. Search court cases for free, read the case summary, find docket information, download court documents, track case status, and get alerts when cases are updated. Page 46 Grayson County District Courts Records - Trellis.Law Germany / 11 June 2009 / Kammergericht / 20 Sch 04/07. | 01/12/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | | 01/20/2017, JUDGMENT: PLAINTIFF; COSTS: $58.00; PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $24,200.00; INTEREST AWARD: 6 % FROM DOJ; IS JUDGMENT SATISFIED: YES; DATE SATISFACTION FILED: 09/08/2017, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The California Court adopted the factual findings and the legal considerations underlying the arbitral award, thus incorporating the award in its judgment. The SCC rendered an award in favor of the Seller in June 2008, finding that the Parties had concluded during the course of two telephone conversations a valid contract, which included the arbitration clause in two telephone conversations. County court Landgericht Frankfurt am Main. It considered that there were no grounds for denying recognition under Article V(1)(d) or Article V(1)(b) NYC. Forfeiture AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed June 29, 2023 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. Germany / 12 October 2009 / Oberlandesgericht Mnchen / 34 Sch 20/08. The Bundesgerichtshof added that it confirmed the view previously expressed by the Oberlandesgericht that under German law, a foreign broker - together with a German broker - will be held to have deliberately inflicted intentional damage on German consumers/investors, thereby offending good morality, when the foreign broker consciously and blatantly grants the German broker full and uncontrolled access to foreign stock exchanges without previously controlling the latter's business plan. Public Records Policy. } The Kammergericht Berlin upheld the doctrine of "double exequatur", whereby an applicant is granted the choice between having either the exequatur judgment or the award declared enforceable where an award is rendered in a jurisdiction following the doctrine of merger.
Hotels On 601 Orangeburg, Sc,
Mt Washington Cruise Parking,
Disadvantages Of Programmed Decision Making,
Articles G
